MEMBERS of various civic organziations have asked the Supreme Court to compel the Congress to finally pass an anti-dynasty law, highlighting the widening gap between the Constitution’s promise and lawmakers' inaction.

The petitioners, led by 1Sambayan, lamented that 30 years have passed but no legislative action was taken even if the 1987 Constitution explicitly mandates that political dynasties be prohibited

The petition raises a critical question: can the judiciary force Congress to act? Historically, the Supreme Court has avoided intervening in legislative inaction, citing separation of powers, but petitioners argue that the Court must step in to enforce a constitutional mandate that's been ignored for too long.

Creating an anti-dynasty law is complex. Some lawmakers argue it infringes on political freedoms, while others believe voter education is the solution. However, the biggest obstacle remains the self-interest of many lawmakers, who come from political dynasties themselves, making meaningful reform difficult.

Despite multiple attempts, anti-dynasty bills have failed to gain traction, with political families wielding significant influence in Congress. Critics argue that this entrenched control leads to corruption, stifles new political voices, and undermines democracy.

Political dynasties contribute to systemic issues like corruption and unequal development. Advocates for the anti-dynasty law argue that limiting their power is essential to building a more democratic society where opportunities for public service are open to all citizens.

The HIgh Court’s decision could set a powerful precedent, forcing Congress to address the issue and potentially reshaping Philippine governance by breaking the stranglehold of political dynasties.(Kate Glydel Anne Alegado & Rena Cris Ynoy, CTU-TC interns)

• Tags
• #Supreme Court
• #Congress
• #Political Dynasties
• #1Sambayan
• #1987 Constitution
• #Anti-Dynasty Law